Finance · Benchmark note

← Finance research

The instances behind the paper.

The certificate is evaluated on four collections of portfolio-selection problems, all built from real market data.

The problem underneath every one of them is the same one described on this site: hold a limited number of names out of a universe, in chosen amounts, at the best trade-off between return and risk we can prove. What changes from one collection to the next is where the numbers come from, and how large a universe they let us test.

Public benchmark · OR-Library

port1–port5 — five real market covariances, n = 31 to 225

The standard, most-cited test set for cardinality-constrained portfolio selection: real covariances built from the Hang Seng, DAX, FTSE 100, S&P 100 and Nikkei 225. Small by institutional standards, but the set every published result in this area gets compared against.

Public benchmark · Frangioni & Gentile

n = 200, 300 and 400, each with a published best bound

A mean-variance benchmark distributed with a known upper and lower bound at a fixed cardinality. Its problems add minimum buy-in sizes to the cardinality limit.

Real market data · Cesarone et al.

Six universes, n = 28 to 1,203, from real weekly returns

Sample covariances built from real historical prices, not generated — from the Dow Jones up to a 1,203-name NASDAQ composite. Two of the six are rank-deficient, because there are fewer weeks of history than assets, which is typical of real covariances at that size.

Our own pull · a real market at institutional scale

2,901 names, five years of weekly prices

Built because every collection above stops well short of institutional size. Current NASDAQ and NYSE common stock, filtered to names with a complete five-year weekly history and a real, adjusted price — no forward-filled gaps. It carries the survivorship bias of any backfilled universe.

Results. Results on these instances are reported in the certificate article and the upcoming paper.